<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nocJOURNAL.com &#187; Energy Savings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nocjournal.com/category/savingenergy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nocjournal.com</link>
	<description>Sleep Well Blog - Loving Down Bedding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:52:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Down Bedding Vs. Polyester Bedding</title>
		<link>http://nocjournal.com/2010/02/60/</link>
		<comments>http://nocjournal.com/2010/02/60/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy savings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nocjournal.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often we get a question from a concerned consumer about the eco impact of their buying decisions.  In this case they want to know which bedding has the least eco impact. So we will discuss the two options we know pretty well &#8211; natural down and feathers versus polyester. We’ll start with the easy one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nocjournal.com/2010/02/60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

